Discover unparalleled comfort and performance with our curated selection of the best long distance running shoes. Elevate your running experience with top-tier footwear designed for endurance and support. Find the perfect stride companion for your marathon journey today.

Endurance pursuits demand resilient footwear, be it the rigors of marathon training or the allure of extended high-mileage runs. The paramount challenge lies in securing running shoes capable of enduring the relentless impact across varied terrains. Nothing is more disheartening than succumbing to fatigue, pain, or injury at the third-mile mark. Fortunately, our quest unveils the optimal choices for the best long distance running shoes, simplifying your selection process.

Critical attributes encompassing responsive cushioning, robust rubber outsoles, steadfast stability, and a snug fit take precedence in identifying suitable long-distance running companions. To unravel the intricacies, we sought sagacious counsel from podiatrist Alissa Kuizinas, DPM, and Eric Orton, a luminary running coach and author. Their insights illuminated the significance of tailoring shoe selection to the unique foot shape, gait, and individual running inclinations and aspirations of high-mileage runners. Additionally, a board-certified clinical specialist in orthopedic physical therapy and an adept athletic trainer, both integral members of our Review Board, meticulously scrutinized this discourse for precision, shopping insights, and guidelines on ensuring safe long distance runs.

In our pursuit of a thorough evaluation, we donned various pairs, subjecting them to rigorous trials in The Verywell Testing Lab and real-world scenarios—concrete roads, meandering paths, and motorized treadmills alike. This process aimed to decipher nuances in fit, tactile sensation, and overall performance. Our cadre routinely assesses running footwear from preeminent brands, pledging to continually revise this compilation with emerging models, ensuring our recommendations mirror the evolving market landscape.

12 Best Long Distance Running Shoes:

Best Overall: Brooks Glycerin 20 Running Shoes

Pros

• Excellent shock absorption
• Soft and responsive
• Great cushioning

Cons

• The toe box may be narrow for some

Brooks presents the Glycerin 20, a paragon of requisites for endurance runners—providing the essential cushioning, energy restitution, and shielding against impacts inherent in long-distance pursuits. Upon subjecting this pair to scrutiny, our admiration burgeoned for its pliable and sumptuously padded foam cushioning, imparting a buoyant traverse and commendable safeguarding across extended distances. Remarkably, its feathery weight belies the substantial cushioning it affords.

The supple and ventilated upper manifests a snug embrace, devoid of constriction or vexation. Tailored for neutral runners, the shoe boasts an expansive foundation, amplifying its holistic steadiness. Although a discernment of a somewhat snug toe box surfaced, the redeeming feature lies in the availability of the Glycerin 20 in three widths, accommodating the nuances of diverse foot dimensions and allowing ample room for bespoke orthotics or insoles.

Commendable attributes extend to the indulgent heel collar and tongue, bestowing an added layer of solace, particularly during protracted high-mileage endeavors. This dependable footwear emerges as a superlative selection for distance runners in pursuit of an eminently crafted, high-performing shoe suitable for tempo runs and condensed workouts. Notably, it proffers comfort for individuals engaging in prolonged periods of standing—a testament to its versatile utility.

Related: The Top 15 Men’s Hair Clippers, According to Barbers and Hairstylists

Best Men’s: Saucony Men’s Triumph 21 Sneaker

Pros

• Great cushioning
• Lightweight and breathable
• Excellent shock absorption

Cons

• Too plush for speedwork

Saucony’s Triumph 21 emerges as a luxuriant and dependable choice tailored for aficionados of lengthy runs, embodying opulence and steadfast reinforcement across vast distances. This iteration, a refined upgrade from its forerunners, achieves a reduction in weight without compromising the pivotal attributes of support and impact mitigation. Noteworthy is the midfoot’s contribution, orchestrating landings that are concurrently tender yet responsively articulate, complemented by a rocker configuration fostering seamless transitions and an ergonomically streamlined gait.

An idiosyncrasy reminiscent of certain Saucony running counterparts lies in the lacing architecture, adorned with supplementary loops flanking the midfoot. This augments the tailorability of the fit, amplifying stability in tandem. The mesh upper, a lightweight and ventilated construction, plays a pivotal role in averting foot vexations and blister formation, an asset that persists regardless of the mileage on the runner’s agenda.

While the Triumph 21 proves somewhat opulent for high-velocity training, it crystallizes into an exceptional option for extensive running jaunts and ambulatory endeavors on rigid asphalt, treadmills, or analogous unyielding substrates. Bolstered by commendable traction and equilibrium, it seamlessly transitions into a viable candidate for cross-training pursuits. Moreover, its endorsement by the American Podiatric Medical Association (APMA) through the Seal of Acceptance attests to its orthopedically sound design, a consensus forged by a panel of podiatrists affirming its contribution to fostering foot health.

Best Women’s: Hoka Clifton 9

Pros

• Soft, responsive cushioning
• Breathable, flexible upper
• Excellent support and durability

Cons

• A tall heel may lead to blisters

Hoka’s Clifton 9 seamlessly melds feathery cushioning and steadfast reinforcement, rendering it an epitome of excellence for individuals engaged in protracted running endeavors. Earning the prestigious American Podiatric Medical Association (APMA) Seal of Acceptance accentuates its accolades, affirming its reputation for a tactful equilibrium between tenderness and responsiveness. Our empirical examination of the Clifton 9 unveiled a remarkable interplay of opulence in cushioning and unwavering support, elevating the experience of prolonged runs without imposing any discernible encumbrance.

The pliable and breathable knit upper, a testament to Hoka’s design prowess, embraces the foot snugly, fostering an ambiance conducive to the unbridled natural movement of the foot. The expansive toe box, a recurring hallmark in Hoka footwear, bequeaths an expansive fit, facilitating the uninhibited splaying of toes. Facilitating seamless ingress and egress, the heel tab not only serves a utilitarian purpose but also contributes to augmented support. It is noteworthy, however, that the elevated tab may, on occasion, engage with the wearer’s anatomy in a manner that elicits discomfort or, in extreme cases, blister formation.

The kinetic impetus is perpetuated by the shoe’s artfully crafted rocker shape, orchestrating rapid and resourceful strides. Simultaneously, the rubber outsole and tenacious treads assume a pivotal role in fortifying the shoe’s overall durability and enhancing safety parameters for road running, even in inclement weather conditions. Despite its mere 7-ounce weight, the Clifton 9 defies conventional expectations, exuding a pervasive sense of support that belies its lightweight constitution.

Best Budget: Asics Women’s Gel-Excite 9

Pros

• Lightweight, responsive cushioning
• Ideal for beginners
• It comes in three widths

Cons

• Not be as durable as other options 
• May run narrow

Embarking on the realm of distance running or seeking fiscal prudence in acquiring new footwear, Asics unveils the Gel-Excite 9, a testament to frugality without compromising on support, luxurious comfort, and robust defense against the rigors of lengthy runs. In our experiential evaluation, the mesh upper garnered acclaim for its breathable disposition, rendering a sensation of velvety smoothness against our feet devoid of any instigation of irritation, hot spots, or blister formation.

Moreover, the immediate comfort emanating from the shoes upon unboxing was a salient point of note. While anecdotal testimonials cite a proclivity for narrowness, the availability of three distinct widths ensures a personalized fit consonant with individual foot anatomy and dimensions. In empirical traversals on foot, the shoes manifested a gratifying juxtaposition of lightweight attributes and responsivity, unfurling the merits of a supportive, well-cushioned foam midsole.

At an impressively diminutive weight of less than 8 ounces per shoe, this Asics iteration stakes its claim as one of the most weightless within our roster. However, a caveat surfaces in terms of potential trade-offs in durability when juxtaposed with weightier alternatives boasting thicker soles, such as Hoka’s Bondi 8. The Gel-Excite 9 emerges as an alluring option for distance runners eager to explore the realm of nimble, responsive footwear sans a substantial upfront expenditure.

Best for Flat Feet: Asics GT-2000 11

Pros

• Excellent stability and support
• Great for speedwork 
• It comes in three widths

Cons

• May feel stiff at first
• Not as cushioned as some other options

Asics introduces yet another dependable contender, the GT-2000 11, a favored choice amongst flat-footed aficionados of long-distance pursuits, owing to its superlative stability. This tandem boasts a robust midsole furnished with resilient foam, strategically designed to counteract overpronation—a proclivity for the inward rolling of the feet commonly observed in flat-footed runners. The consequential outcome manifests as a more seamless and inherently organic gait, fostering prolonged and resourceful running exploits.

In the crucible of our evaluations, the initial impression conveyed a modicum of rigidity, swiftly metamorphosing into a pliable companion through the process of acclimatization. Furthermore, its featherweight disposition renders it an eminently viable choice not only for distance running but also for expeditious training sessions and cross-disciplinary workouts. The mesh upper, characterized by its breathable attributes, delicately envelops and conforms to the contours of the foot, imparting an augmented layer of support.

A noteworthy facet lies in the GT-2000’s availability in three distinct widths, affording the prospect of attaining an impeccably tailored fit. Although it may not rival the opulence in cushioning offered by Brooks’ Adrenaline GTS 22, making it potentially more attractive to overpronators desiring a more indulgent ride, it emerges as a quintessential everyday trainer for distance runners characterized by flexible arches or flat feet capable of gracefully accommodating double-digit mileage with aplomb.

Related: Hot Yoga Benefits, Risks, and How It Can Help You Lose Weight

Best Neutral Runners: Mizuno Women’s Wave Rider 26 Running Shoe

Pros

• Very responsive
• Flexible and breathable
• Excellent grip and durability

Cons

• Runs small
• Not protective enough for very cold weather

Mizuno’s Wave Rider 26 emerges as a formidable selection for those adhering to the neutral running paradigm and in pursuit of a distance-centric shoe that seamlessly marries support, responsiveness, and comfort. Throughout our rigorous examination, the shoe’s prowess in energy restitution captured our admiration, persisting admirably even during the culmination of extensive runs. This latest iteration of the Wave Rider introduces an additional duo of millimeters within its comprehensive midsole of foam cushioning, thereby furnishing an elevated, opulent traversal experience.

The footwear, by virtue of its design, extends a predisposition for immediate comfort, negating the necessity for an acclimatization phase. The capacious nature of the toe box augments the organic rhythm of foot kinetics—a nuance underscored by Dr. Kuizinas as particularly consequential for extended running excursions. Should one necessitate an augmented expanse, the availability of wide sizes accommodates this requirement.

Furthermore, the upper component, lightweight and permeable, contributes substantially to the global sense of comfort, concurrently mitigating the risks of foot overheating and blistering. However, it merits noting that the porous constitution of the stretchy mesh may present inadequacies in insulating against inclement cold conditions. Nonetheless, the tenacity and security afforded by the adept rubber outsole remain unwavering, irrespective of the varied terrains encountered. For those in quest of a dependable shoe that seamlessly intertwines a supple yet responsive journey, adept at withstanding the rigors of high-mileage training, Mizuno’s Wave Rider 26 undeniably stands as a superlative choice.

Best for Bad Knees: Brooks Adrenaline GTS 22

Pros

• Good support for flat feet
• Excellent shock absorption
• It comes in four wides

Cons

• Not for neutral runners

In the realm of long-distance running footwear, the intrinsic need for robust impact attenuation holds paramount significance, especially when grappling with susceptibility to knee or other articulatory discomforts. Throughout our meticulous evaluations, the Brooks’ Adrenaline GTS 22 emerged as a paragon, boasting a sumptuous underpinning that adeptly absorbs shocks induced by unyielding surfaces, all the while maintaining an air of nimbleness and responsiveness. Bestowed with the esteemed APMA Seal of Acceptance, this triumph of engineering incorporates a stabilizing apparatus adept at curbing superfluous movements, averting the undesirable pronation of the feet during the running stride.

In the crucible of trial runs, the virtues of an impervious, streamlined upper were manifest, fostering a conducive environment for invigorating airflow and safeguarding against the scourge of blisters. Concurrently, the tenacious rubber outsole exhibited a mettle that resonated with durability, poised to endure the rigors of extensive road traversals. An additional commendation is in order for the footwear’s inclusivity, presenting itself in a quartet of widths and offering sufficient depth to accommodate bespoke orthotic solutions.

However, the introduction of augmented stability attributes inevitably imparts a perceptible rigidity to the shoe, potentially rendering it less pliable than alternative selections. Ergo, the discerning neutral runner might find greater resonance with a more yielding alternative, exemplified by Mizuno’s Wave Rider 26. Conversely, for individuals exhibiting proclivities towards overpronation or those beleaguered by the specter of knee afflictions, the Adrenaline GTS 22 stands as an ardent recommendation.

Best for Wide Feet: New Balance Women’s Fresh Foam X More v4

Pros

• Available in three widths
• Plush cushioning
• Versatile

Cons

• May feel too bulky for some

New Balance has established its reputation for delivering running shoes of superior quality, renowned for their comfort and an extensive array of sizes and widths. The Fresh Foam X More v4 from this esteemed brand stands out as an outstanding choice, particularly catering to those with broader feet, offering a commodious fit with three available widths. Tailored for neutral runners, this selection proves to be the epitome of excellence when the training regimen demands prolonged sessions covering extensive distances at a measured pace.

In the crucible of our evaluations, the inherent opulence of the shoe’s comfort and its impeccable fit manifested immediately, asserting its prowess right from the inaugural donning. A noteworthy facet lies in its bounteous, responsive cushioning, where the buoyancy is accentuated by the shoe’s ingeniously crafted rocker design. Boasting a broader platform compared to antecedent iterations, the More v4 excels in shock absorption, facilitating seamless transitions throughout your run.

Remarkably versatile, we observed the shoe’s commendable performance in the domain of fitness walking a boon for adherents of the run-walk method, seeking to fortify their endurance. The engineered mesh upper, designed for breathability, ensures the feet remain in a state of perpetual comfort, imbued with freshness and dryness. However, akin to Hoka’s Bondi 8, it’s prudent to note that the shoe’s maximal cushioning and the augmented thickness of its sole might be perceived as excessively unwieldy by certain wearers.

Best for Marathon Racing: Saucony Men’s Endorphin Pro 3 Sneaker

Pros

• Excellent energy return
• Designed for racing
• Lightweight

Cons

• Pricier than other options 
• Not protective enough for very cold weather

Should you harbor aspirations of triumphing in your forthcoming endurance race, consider exploring Saucony’s Endorphin Speed Pro 3—an exemplar within the brand’s arsenal, distinguished by its ethereal weight, rapidity, and heightened responsiveness. Infused with an integrated carbon-fiber plate, it stands as a testament to enhancing forward propulsion—facilitating a swifter and more effective stride. In this latest iteration, a judicious redesign is evident, featuring supplementary lightweight foam cushioning nestled within the midsole and an augmentation of carbon rubber on the exterior, promising an even more gratifying and secure journey.

The shoe’s svelte mesh upper, while being exceptionally featherweight and conducive to breathability, falls short in providing substantial insulation for endeavors amidst frigid weather conditions. Nonetheless, our admiration is reserved for its exceptional reinforcement and steadfast stability, a remarkable feat given its status as a feathery footwear option. We posit that its structural integrity renders it more than equal to the rigors of demanding marathon competitions.

The investment required for Saucony’s Endorphin Speed Pro 3 surpasses that of its counterparts on our curated list. Yet, discerning athletes, poised for serious competition, will discern its worth, rooted in the deployment of high-caliber materials and the delivery of superlative performance.

Best for Narrow Feet: Nike Women’s React Infinity Run Flyknit 3

Pros

• Very responsive
• Supportive fit
• Flexible, breathable upper

Cons

• Arch support may be too much for some

Nike’s preeminent offering for the arduous discipline of distance running, the React Infinity Run Flyknit 3, stands distinguished by its trifecta of virtues—featherlight, enduring, and a bastion of support. Adhering to the archetype of many a Nike creation, this pair veers towards the narrower spectrum, rendering it an optimal selection for those accustomed to the incessant lateral shifts within conventional running footwear. The svelte contours of its design orchestrate an impeccable equilibrium, conferring just the right measure of immobility and steadiness along the midfoot trajectory. Notably, the U-shaped heel cup further fortifies its mettle, proffering an augmented bulwark for protracted jaunts.

The distinctive rocker configuration of this pair plays the role of a catalyst, efficaciously nudging the runner in a forward trajectory, while the effervescent embrace of its foam-based cushioning ensures a gratifyingly plush and responsive sojourn. The aeration-friendly upper manifests flexibility, orchestrating a symphony of optimal airflow and safeguarding against the scourge of blisters. Although some wearers might discern a semblance of rigidity in the arch support, our endorsement for this selection extends explicitly to the cohort of distance runners harboring a penchant for augmented stability in this specific domain.

Best for Trail Running: New Balance Fresh Foam X Hierro v7 Trail Running Shoes

Pros

• Excellent traction
• Very stable and supportive
• Lightweight and breathable

Cons

• Not waterproof
• Run narrow

Are you an aficionado of enduring, long-distance runs along the labyrinthine trails? If so, our earnest endorsement aligns with New Balance’s Fresh Foam X Hierro v7—a paragon of trail running footwear that seamlessly amalgamates the trifecta of cushioning, traction, and support. In our empirical trials, this particular selection exhibited an astonishingly lithe demeanor, defying the conventional heft associated with trail-oriented shoes. This attribute proved instrumental in forestalling the onset of weariness during the denouement of extensive runs. Simultaneously, it excelled in furnishing commendable stability and aegis, accentuated by a fortified toe guardian that stands sentinel against the perils of rocks, roots, and sundry impediments.

Unlike its counterparts in the realm of trail running shoes, the Hierro v7 does not lay claim to waterproof prowess. However, its mesh upper exudes a superlative degree of breathability and boasts an expeditious drying proclivity. Throughout our evaluative forays, we were gratified by the Hierro v7’s comprehensive, full-length foam cushioning, which rivaled its counterparts in affording optimal shock absorption and comfort—qualities quintessential to long-distance running shoes. A crowning moment in our scrutiny was the robust constitution of its soles and the tenacious adherence of its lugs, efficaciously navigating the precarious terrain of wet surfaces, undulating landscapes, as well as ascents and descents.

It is imperative to acknowledge a nuance in the Hierro v7’s design—a subtle narrowing in the toe box, a deviation from the customary spaciousness emblematic of New Balance shoes. However, for those yearning for additional expansiveness, the option of wide sizes is judiciously available. Moreover, the sartorial finesse embodied in the shoe’s streamlined and chic aesthetics renders it a sartorially versatile companion, harmonizing seamlessly with a spectrum of activities.

Best Cushioned: Hoka Women’s Bondi 8

Pros

• Maximum cushioning
• Made with recycled materials
• Available in three widths

Cons

• Not for speedwork

For aficionados of substantial underfoot padding, Hoka’s Bondi 8 emerges as an indisputable choice, standing prominently among the echelons of the most sought-after running shoes in the current market milieu. This footwear, adorned with the coveted APMA approval, boasts a copious stratum of ultralight, tenacious foam—a material alchemy that imbues each stride with a harmonious amalgamation of yielding softness and sprightly rebound.

In the crucible of our evaluative rigors, the Bondi 8 unfurled its tapestry of opulence, enveloping our feet in a veritable cocoon of plushness, serenity, and fortitude. Noteworthy is the commodious expanse afforded to the toes within the box, presenting an environment conducive to splaying. Furthermore, the shoe extends its embrace to a spectrum of widths, encompassing wide and extra-wide sizes—a boon for those contending with bunions, blisters, or possessing feet of a broader disposition. The upper facade of the shoe, fashioned from recycled materials, epitomizes a synthesis of lightweight comportment and breathability, orchestrating an ode to sustainability that cradles our feet in comfort and repels the encroachment of moisture through miles of traverse.

However, amidst our eulogies for its substantial and buttressing sole, a caveat surfaces. The Bondi 8, regally adept at the demands of protracted runs, relinquishes its crown when the purview extends to the realms of racing, speed training, or the crucible of fast-paced workouts. The monetary investment required to procure this footwear is perceptibly weighty, yet we posit that the splurge is commensurate with the stellar oeuvre of its performance and the impenetrable veneer of its durability.

The Key Elements of Long Distance Running Shoes

Heel Drop Wisdom

The heel-to-toe drop in running shoes, measuring the height difference between the heel and forefoot, wields significance. Generally, distance running shoes boast a heel-to-toe drop ranging from 8 to 10 millimeters. Brands like Hoka, exemplified by the Clifton 9 and Bondi 8, deviate with lower drops, often around 4 or 5 millimeters. Opting for a lower drop accommodates midfoot or forefoot landers, while a higher drop promotes rearfoot striking. Elevated heel-drop shoes focus on cushioning the rearfoot, crucial for heel strikers. Pinpointing your foot strike requires expertise; consulting a specialized running store or a physical therapist for gait analysis is advised.

Crafting the Perfect Fit

Ensuring a snug fit in running shoes is paramount for comfort and injury prevention. The shoes should embrace your feet snugly, striking a balance between tight and loose. Immobilizing your heel and allowing extra room in the toe box, particularly half an inch in front of your longest toe, is imperative. This precaution gains importance in high heel-to-toe drop shoes, where the upward-sloping heel propels the foot forward, emphasizing the need for added space. To verify the fit, removing the insole and aligning your foot to it ensures the shape and length align with your foot.

Considering arch types low, medium, or high adds another layer. Runners with high arches benefit from neutral shoes, whereas low arches may necessitate stability-focused options. Brands such as Brooks, New Balance, and Asics cater to varied foot widths.

Navigating the Weight Factor

Weight plays a pivotal role in the performance of running shoes. Heavier shoes, like New Balance’s Fresh Foam X More v4, offer enhanced support and durability, ideal for extended runs. On the flip side, lighter and more responsive options like Saucony’s Endorphin Pro 3 are preferred for serious runners engaged in long-distance races. Trail running shoes, designed for rougher terrains, inherently carry more weight due to thicker outsoles and added support.

Material Musings

Choosing shoes crafted from premium, durable materials is essential for enduring high mileage. Knit or mesh uppers are particularly recommended for long-distance running—ensuring comfort, breathability, and flexibility. The material snugly envelops the foot, providing support while accommodating natural movement during runs. Ample cushioning is crucial for distance running, preventing fatigue. Midsoles, composed of soft foam or gel cushioning, offer a spectrum from plush to firm, allowing runners to choose based on preference.

Outsoles made of durable rubber ensure stability and traction, a crucial consideration for outdoor runs. This is especially relevant for those who primarily run outdoors, where terrain conditions vary.

Endurance in Every Stride

High-quality and durable, distance running shoes from reputable brands typically endure 300 to 400 miles. However, the longevity of lightweight racing shoes, particularly those with embedded carbon fiber plates like Saucony’s Endorphin Pro 3, might be comparatively shorter. Trail running shoes, designed for rougher terrains, often boast more durable outsoles, making them a favorable choice for those who frequently embark on off-road long-distance runs.